We went to the billionaire's home to get answers, as a leading homelessness charity cut ties with the landlord and tenants begged the mayor to save their homes.
Also should have mentioned that Criterion Capital deleted public comments made by the Save the Central YMCA campaign on their LinkedIn posts. They are hyper-sensitive to this kind of criticism.
- Landlords put up rent rates each year, because... Markets
- So then other landlords put up their rent (supply/regulation issue)
- People struggle, some end up need support from the council
- Councils are desperate for accomodation, and haven't built much social housing (and being sold off continuously for private gain)
- Some landlords decides it's easier to rent to the council, maybe only a bit below market rate, certainly not council rates.
- Landlords still make a chunk of change. Rents still go up annually. People and councils are desperately poor.
It's probably a bit much to say everything has to do with housing. But the massive growth in wealth inequality (less so income), could probably explained by the above. Credit to Gary's Economics for banging that particular drum.
More tremendous journalism, up to the very highest standards. I am in awe of your tenacity, dedication and work month over month. I just maxed out my subscription - you’ll need all the support you can get against this grim cadre.
@Londoncentric: don't let up. councils that are potential "clients" - i.e. encouraged/targeted by Criterion to use their properties for short-term housing - should be warned/named and shamed/possibly prevented.
The units vacated by bona fide rent-paying tenants, under false pretence, should be forced to remain empty.
How can we, as concerned members of the public, help address this?
Great journalistic work! It really is a sad story how ruthless Aziz controlled entities are. But most depressing it that they get away with it. I hope that the initiative of the councillor to ban all cooperation with this company gets the support from other London councils.
Obviously tenants should seek legal advice and if they have the stomach for it, resist giving up possession until there is a court order. Obtaining possession on the basis of a s21 can be a minefield for landlords and given the billionare's cavallier attitued, it seems plausible there has been plenty of non-compliance with their landlord's obligations.
Depending on their income, tenants may be entitled to legal aid
Astonishing digging from London Centric. Shows the absolute importance of having local news in a city like London
More brilliant work! Keep piling the pressure on.
Jim v Aziz, round 7 — keep ‘em coming!!
Also should have mentioned that Criterion Capital deleted public comments made by the Save the Central YMCA campaign on their LinkedIn posts. They are hyper-sensitive to this kind of criticism.
Thank you for keeping the pressure and making this family accountable.
The loop of:
- Landlords put up rent rates each year, because... Markets
- So then other landlords put up their rent (supply/regulation issue)
- People struggle, some end up need support from the council
- Councils are desperate for accomodation, and haven't built much social housing (and being sold off continuously for private gain)
- Some landlords decides it's easier to rent to the council, maybe only a bit below market rate, certainly not council rates.
- Landlords still make a chunk of change. Rents still go up annually. People and councils are desperately poor.
It's probably a bit much to say everything has to do with housing. But the massive growth in wealth inequality (less so income), could probably explained by the above. Credit to Gary's Economics for banging that particular drum.
Jim & Team,
More tremendous journalism, up to the very highest standards. I am in awe of your tenacity, dedication and work month over month. I just maxed out my subscription - you’ll need all the support you can get against this grim cadre.
Thank you!
@Londoncentric: don't let up. councils that are potential "clients" - i.e. encouraged/targeted by Criterion to use their properties for short-term housing - should be warned/named and shamed/possibly prevented.
The units vacated by bona fide rent-paying tenants, under false pretence, should be forced to remain empty.
How can we, as concerned members of the public, help address this?
Like a terrier at his ankle. Don’t let go!
Thank you thank you! Despicable that they tried to pull this stunt AND profit from councils who are squeezed for cash.
A silly letter from Carter-Ruck! You have Made It! I feel like you should get a telegram from Ian Hislop or something
Well done Jim!
Sadiq needs to answer many questions and put pressure on his friend Aziz. Otherwise, he cannot be serious for a fourth term in the office.
Great journalistic work! It really is a sad story how ruthless Aziz controlled entities are. But most depressing it that they get away with it. I hope that the initiative of the councillor to ban all cooperation with this company gets the support from other London councils.
Obviously tenants should seek legal advice and if they have the stomach for it, resist giving up possession until there is a court order. Obtaining possession on the basis of a s21 can be a minefield for landlords and given the billionare's cavallier attitued, it seems plausible there has been plenty of non-compliance with their landlord's obligations.
Depending on their income, tenants may be entitled to legal aid
Carter Ruck. Add Private Eye and search. It's a shame that Global Counsel have closed down as they would be the perfect fit.
Keep going, you’re clearly making a difference